Wednesday, November 7, 2007

FatKat to use quant investing to help you pick stocks

FatKat is the latest company aiming to make sense of the exploding amount of information on the Web and elsewhere to help you make better investment decisions.

It has yet to launch, but the Wellesley Hillis, Mass. company is worthy of mention because it builds on work by technologist Ray Kurzweil, who has given substantial thought about future trends. It is also backed with $2 million from some well-known investors, including Silicon Valley venture capitalist Vinod Khosla and former Nasdaq chairman Michael Brown, according to PEHub.

That said, there is no evidence that Kurzweil and his backers can apply his prolific inventiveness to push things forward in the already advanced field of “quant” investing, which is the area FatKat is targeting.

Quantative investing is already applied an estimated trillion dollars of market funds, and the trend is expected to grow, the company says on its Web site. Such investing consists of using math and science to recognize patterns in stock market developments, and then using algorithms to make investments based on those patterns. Here’s the company’s summary of quant investing to date. FatKat appears to want to pull big names and minds together, and build a technology that boasts just enough of an advantage that it can convince investors to use it.

The latest investment is part of a $2.4 million third round of financing by the company, according to a regulatory filing. Other backers include Teradyne co-founder Alex d’Arbeloff, funds controlled by Revolution Health exec and nanotech expert, and Zyvex CEO James Von Ehr, PEHub’s Alex Haislip reports.

Grouptivity, stripping and sharing Web content

grouptivity.bmpGrouptivity is the latest start-up that wants to let you share your views on Web content with friends or work colleagues.


Specifically, Grouptivity gives you a toolbar that lets you easily strip all of the content from any Web page, including text, images and video. It puts that content onto a clipboard, which you can then send to your friends with notations (see partial screenshot below).

The messages are called GroupMail because they can go to multiple people. It lets you add friends from your address book, or IM buddies, so that you can see if they are available to correspond with.

Grouptivity is similar to Clipmarks, another site that lets you cut and paste pieces of a Web page. However, Clipmarks forces you to go back to your email client to send the content. Grouptivity is different, because the stripped content is automatically loaded into a form that is ready to send. All you do is enter the email addresses and hit send. You can also choose a pre-selected group of friends to correspond with.

More details here. It honors copyright. If text is stripped from the Web, Grouptivity only copies the first 300 words and then provides a link to the rest of it. Same with photo and video. A thumbnail is provided, but a recipient of your message views the original media by clicking back to the original site.

Group responses are assembled into a single view, eliminating the multiple back-and-forth email messages.

Grouptivity is a subsidiary of private company, AppMail.


grouptivity2.bmp

Social.com Goes Up for Sale




Could this be the ultimate social networking domain name in the history of the world ever? The owner, Guided Tour Software, wrote to tell Mashable that social.com went up for auction on Wednesday, with the bidding closing on April 4th. They claim that the domain is worth a 7-8 figure sum, and updates are being posted to a blog on the homepage. A release put out by the company tells a tale of domain theft that we're not totally convinced by, but there's no doubt that they'll find some interest without the need for a tantalizing back story.


Web 2.0 is being heralded as the time of the worst domain names ever - Flickr, del.icio.us, ma.gnolia and many more point to the fact that there just aren't many good domains left. But would social.com dramatically increase your chances of success?


I don't think so - personally, I find it annoying trying to track down information about a company with a generic name, particularly when they refuse to include the “.com” in the official title (”Wink” or “Slide” for instance). What's more, Flickr and del.cio.us prove that tricky domains are no barrier to a great service. The counter-argument, of course, is that telling your friends to go to “Twitter” is much easier than telling them to go to “Twttr”, the site's previous URL. Likewise, Topix.net is now facing the risky switch to Topix.com, due to confusion over the brand. I'd save your VC money and pass on Social.com, but there's no doubt they'll find a buyer, and the peak of the social networking craze is surely the best time to sell.



via Mashable!

Google AdSense: Google’s Information and Tools


  • Google AdSense FAQ: the Adsense support for official guidelines.

  • Google AdSense Help Page provides a very detailed FAQ about Google AdSense. Learn optimization essentials, how to design successful ads, savvy ad placement and how to use features wisely.

  • Google Adsense Program Policies.

  • Google AdSense Ad Formats: an overview.

  • Google AdSense Success Stories provided by Google itself. Many interesting insights in concrete decisions, which helped to increase Google AdSense revenues.

  • Google AdWords: Keyword-Tool: The Keyword Tool generates potential keywords for your ad campaign and reports their Google statistics, including search performance and seasonal trends. Start your search by entering your own keyword phrases or a specific URL. You can then add new keywords to the green box at the right.


via Internet Vibes, Smashing Magazine

Things You Probably Don’t Know About Google AdSense


  • “AdSense Earning = Impression-count x Click-though-rate x Cost-per-click x smart-pricing-factor. Viewing your on website will not get you banned. Just make sure you don’t click on the ads. However, repeatedly reload your page to jack up page impressions can get you banned. Click-through-rate (CTR) is ratio of clicks per impressions. It can range from 0.1% to 30%, but most commonly around 1% to 10%.” [100 Google Adsense Tips]

  • First impressions count: make sure the ad unit with the highest CTR is the first ad unit in the HTML code of your page. Keep in mind that the first ad unit in the source code is not always the first ad unit that your users will see when the page finishes loading in their browser.” [Inside AdSense: First impressions count]

  • Ads placed near rich content and navigational aids usually do well because users are focused on those areas of a page. on pages where users are typically focused on reading an article, ads placed directly below the end of the editorial content tend to perform very well.”[Where should I place Google ads on my pages?]

  • Format is important for multiple ad units, display your ad units where repeat users will notice them, place a leaderboard immediately after the last post.” [Six AdSense optimization tips for forums]

  • The middle, above the fold location performs the best. Best performing ad format is the large rectangle, 336×280. So the wider ad formats are doing better than the other ones and the reason is that they actually take up fewer lines. And so with every additional line, you have a chance of losing that interested user. So the wider formats do best so specifically, the top three formats are the 336×280 that you see on the page; the 300×250 medium rectangle; and then the 160×600 wide skyscraper. We have a feature in the AdSense account where you are able to multi-select different color palettes that blend with your site to add some variety and freshness to the ads. And that also will help decrease ad blindness.” [Google AdSense Optimization Webinar]

  • “The second most active placement in terms of click-throughs tends to be the right-hand rail or margin”. “Skyscrapers” and vertical banners do well when placed next to the content in the main body. Square and rectangle ads placed within the center column also do well, provided they are placed in context to the content. Ads placed below the fold tend to perform least well, although that isn’t a hard-and-fast rule.” [Yahoo! Publisher Network: Location, location, location…]

  • “I found the most success in placing the Google Adsense medium rectangle either right in the middle of the page or in a middle right column as long as it has content above and below the ad unit. Its is fine to use Adsense Ads on a forum however expect a very low CTR.” [Google Adsense Tips for Webmasters]

  • “Post Adsense ads on text rich pages, avoid titles like the approved ‘Sponsored Links’ and ‘Advertisements’, place Ads above the fold, Match the colors of your ads with the colour scheme of your site, Blend ads with your page - remove the borders by having a similar color as your background.” [How to Increase Google Adsense CTR]

  • “To remove Public Service Ads (PSA) in Google Adsense develop sufficient good content with keywords, Ensure that META tags like ‘title’ & ‘description’ and the headings tags like h1, h2 etc. have content which matches the rest of your site.” [How to Remove Public Service Ads (PSA) in Google Adsense]

  • “You can now run AdSense on the same page as other contextual ad programs.” [It’s official! You can now run AdSense on the same page as other contextual ad programs]

  • “Google AdSense Policy: We ask that publishers not line up images and ads in a way that suggests a relationship between the images and the ads.” [ Inside AdSense: Ad and image placement: a policy clarification ]

  • “Section targeting uses certain html tweaks to force the google adsense bot to focus on specific content. Section targeting is the latest and most effective addition to AdSense”. [Display Relevant Adsense Ads Using Section Targeting]

  • “Over the weekend, I decided to change the number of ads units on my blog based upon where the traffic is coming from. I have a small PHP function that checks to see if the referrer is a search engine, and if it is, I display and additional 2 ad units. My Adsense revenue increasing by 284% on Saturday, Sunday and Monday!” [Positive Adsense Experiment]

  • Never click your own adsense ads or get them clicked for whatever reason. Never change the Adsense code. Do not run competitive contextual text ad or search services on the same site. Do not mask ad elements. Avoid excessive advertising and keyword stuffing.” [ 15 Common Mistakes that Violate Google Adsense TOS ]

  • “Putting ads on your site won’t hurt your traffic. There are 6 sorts of bloggers’ income:

  • Google Adsense, Donations (e.g. PayPal), Text Link Ads (sold for a fixed amount per month),

    Chitika eMiniMalls ads (pay per click), affiliate programs like Amazon, Advertising sold to individual advertisers (three-month campaigns or longer) [How to Make Money From Your Blog - a VERY extensive article]

  • “A number of factors come into play when AdSense tries to determine what the page is about: The URL of the page, the page title, the anchor text of links, the keywords that appear most frequently within the page, search engine queries that lead to the page or to another page that links to the page”. [How to Get Relevant AdSense Ads (Especially For Bloggers)]

  • “Ask yourself if you are willing to compromise your blog’s layout and over-all feel by adding ads in them. Look at your traffic and see if it’s enough to draw the crowd. Make good use of the Ad Channels. Give it time.” [Tips on Blog Adsensification]

  • You can put upto 3 AdSense units on a page. For short articles, CTR is best when ads are placed just above the content. For long articles, CTR improves if ads are placed somewhere in middle of the content. Go Wide - the large rectangle 336×280 is the best paying adsense format.” [Adsense Tips, Layout Optimization Tricks for HigherCTR]

  • “Google AdSense folks have unveiled another useful feature for Adsense publishers - Section Targeting. The concept is simple but the advantages and possibilities are endless.” [Display relevant Ads in Blogs: Just suggest Google]

Breaking: News Corp and NBC Partner To Kill YouTube

News Corp and NBC Universal are expected to announce as early as today that they’re teaming up to create the “YouTube Killer” that’s long been expected from the big media companies. The site will include TV shows and movies, plus the ability for users to edit clips and share them (no mention of user-generated content).

The pair have already struck partnership deals with Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL. The content provided by Fox and NBC includes “Heroes” and “The Office”, “Family Guy” and “24″. Movies from Universal Pictures and 20th Century Fox will also be sold. Time Warner, CBS and Sony Pictures haven’t agreed to a deal.

The first major news outlet to pick up on the deal was the LATimes, which provides disappointingly few details. We know that it could launch as early as this summer, but it’s not totally clear how MySpace will be part of this. Most likely, MySpace Video will form a major part of the deal, providing massive distribution, but Yahoo Video is also mentioned as an outlet for the shows. We’ll have to wait for the release to get the full details. Chances of overtaking YouTube? Slim, but MySpace gives them the best chance at success. Also note that Viacom had already pulled out of the partnership and chose to sue YouTube instead.


Mashable!

SuperMicro announces worlds densest blade

Supermicro is trying to one-up IBM in a claim that they have now released the world's “densest” blade server. The new SBA-714M-T, part of their SuperBlade line, is thin enough to squeeze 10 of the units into a 7U enclosure, making each individual blade consume under a single U of rack space. That precious little space is packed tightly, too, with each unit accepting up to four Quad-core or Dual-core Opteron processors, for up to 16 cores in a single unit.

What is truly interesting is the chipset in which they are trusting to power these behemoth CPUs in such a tiny environment. They are using Nvidia's MCP55 Pro chipset, showing how vendors are beginning to increasingly trust Nvidia with “enterprise-class” hardware.

They, like many others today, are touting energy efficiency as well – with the enclosure for these servers capable of accepting up to four PSUs that they rate at 90% or higher, which is impressive on its own. You can read the
full press release at SuperMicro's site.

See Also


Source: TechSpot News

Pricing of AMD's Phenom CPUs spotted


The Phenom is still a month away or perhaps more, but many have been eagerly anticipating it for some time and wondering how much being an early adopter will set them back. There are now reports of pricing being leaked, and overall the prices don't look as obscene as you might imagine for a new-gen CPU.

The Phenom 9600 and 9700 are listed somewhere between $290 and $330 retail, making their price range very aggressive towards Intel currently lineup of Core 2 and Core 2 Quad processors. On top of that, AMD supposedly plans to continue down the path of “cheaper”, which may result in Phenoms going below $260 to compete with the lower-priced Intel desktop CPUs.

AMD originally got their name in the spotlight not on performance, but on price – perhaps that is exactly what they are intending to do once more. After all, with their plans to unleash a
triple core Phenom, they obviously want to fill out all pricing brackets.


See Also


Source: TechSpot News

Bit9

Over at ZDNet Ryan Naraine recently mentioned a list, compiled by Bit9, of the most vulnerable (think buggy) Windows-based applications. Topping the list was Yahoo Messenger. Microsoft's own IM program, with the clumsy name Windows Live (MSN) Messenger was fourth. If you use Instant Messaging, run your IM program with restricted rights.


I previously suggested QuickTime as an application that should be run in restricted mode. According to Bit9, it was the second most vulnerable application. As if to confirm this, Apple just released a new version of QuickTime with fixes to at least seven security related bugs.

iTunes should be included in the list of restricted mode applications. Not only was it sixth on the Bit9 list, but it also invokes QuickTime.

Restricting Insecure Applications

Back in August I wrote about a free security program for Windows XP called DropMyRights. It comes from a trusted source, requires no maintenance and incurs no overhead.

DropMyRights works by front ending an application. To use it with Internet Explorer for example, you make a shortcut to DropMyRights and modify the shortcut include the full path to the IE executable. When DropMyRights runs, it, in turn, invokes Internet Explorer. But, as the name implies, it first lowers the "rights" for IE.

Thus, even if you are logged on to Windows XP as an Administrator, IE will run with the restricted rights of a limited user. Windows prevents restricted applications from doing a whole host of dangerous things, the most important of which being modifying the system itself and installing software.

For the ultimate in safety, you would, of course, log on to Windows as a restricted user in the first place. But, that brings along it's own set of problems and has proven unworkable for many people. With DropMyRights, we try to hit a happy medium. Although logged on to Windows as an Administrator, we can run the most dangerous programs in restricted mode. But which applications should be run in restricted mode?

As a given, I suggested web browsers (each one, if you have more than one installed), email programs and Microsoft Office. It turns out that two organizations publish lists of the most insecure applications. Let's go see.

Live from New York, it's Founders Club--with M.C. Hammer


(Credit: NBC Universal)

"It's been a year of surreal moments for me," Digg CEO Jay Adelson said to me, "and the big one was when I met M.C. Hammer."

The funny thing is, Hammer himself was standing right next to us. I was talking to Adelson at Tuesday night's edition of the Founders Club, a gathering of NYC-area digital-media and tech folks from both start-ups and major corporations who meet every few months to drink martinis, socialize, and drink more martinis. And before you start thinking about Hammer as a schlocky celebrity guest, keep in mind that he's a "founder" himself--he's one of the guys behind the new site DanceJam.com.

This Founders Club event was held at the Saturday Night Live studios at NBC Universal's Rockefeller Center headquarters, which meant that unlike at previous installments of the floating party series, restrictions prohibited anyone other than the hired professional photographer from snapping pictures. Some attendees, like Valleywag blogger Nicholas Carlson, did anyway and were repeatedly admonished--but really, the security folks had to understand that Carlson's boss at Gawker Media, Nick Denton, was only a few yards away and that the new "Alleywag" couldn't look like he was shirking his duties as a gossip gadfly. (Blog moguls aren't known to be softies.)

Carlson thankfully managed to snap a photo of M.C. Hammer with Adelson--who is, by the way, based in New York despite Digg's reputation as a scion of Valley 2.0. The rapper's presence spurred a light-hearted debate about celebrity power behind new start-ups, like Ashton Kutcher's involvement in telephony brand Ooma. One venture capital representative at the party informed me that actor Damon Wayans has been attempting to pitch a start-up, and that apparently the majority of his rationale consists of "well, I'm Damon Wayans."

So who was there? It was more like "who wasn't there?" The event was hosted by a handful of start-up founders, but the most visible of the bunch was Blip.tv co-founder and COO Dina Kaplan, who emceed the affair along with NBC Universal's Jessica Schell. Among the other hosts were Mark Cenedella of TheLadders, LX.TV's Joseph Varet, Paltalk's Joel Smernoff, Musicnation's Daniel Klaus, and TreeHugger's Graham Hill, who informed me that he actually was at Monday night's IdealBite party, contrary to my observations--he just didn't ride the bull.

I spoke briefly with MediaBistro figurehead Laurel Touby, who said she still can't believe that her start-up (recently acquired by Jupiter Media), has been as successful as it has. "I'm still pinching myself every day," she told me.

Connected Ventures, the InterActiveCorp division that encompasses CollegeHumor, Vimeo, and BustedTees, was heavily represented--CollegeHumor co-founder Josh Abramson was a co-host, and had brought his "better half" (in a strictly professional sense...I think) Ricky Van Veen with him. Also present was Vimeo's Jonathan Marcus and BustedTees' Josh Mohrer, as well as former Connected Ventures executive Zach Klein, who recently left the company and was consequently wearing a name tag that described his affiliation as "Huge Corporation." Conspicuously missing was Jakob Lodwick, who was across town presenting Vimeo at the November installment of the New York Tech Meetup. (The two events happened to awkwardly coincide.)

Zach Klein was also wearing an impressive pair of massive tortoise-shell eyeglasses, which he informed me that he'd purchased for $7 on eBay.

Also present: legendary Valley investor Ron Conway, who required no introduction; Henry Blodget and Peter Kafka of the Silicon Alley Insider; tech party staple Charles Forman of Iminlikewithyou.com, complete with his trademark oversize business cards; Toby Daniels of British import Mint Digital; Glasshouse New York's Caroline Waxler; the socially prolific Auren Hoffman, CEO of Rapleaf, which has been known to raise a few eyebrows; Lorien Gabel of the yet-to-launch Pingg; Rocketboom creator Andrew Baron; and Wallstrip host Lindsay Campbell.

Also present was a guy without a name tag who looked so much like David Spade that some people thought he actually was David Spade. Hey, if M.C. Hammer shows up...


ConnectU co-founder Divya Narendra, still embroiled in a lawsuit against Facebook that goes back to the two companies' days as rival social networks on Harvard's campus, was there in good spirits and informed me that he has no intention of giving up the fight. Several of Facebook's executives, in town for the afternoon's big advertising announcement, were actually on the Founders Club guest list, but word has it that they were tied up at a company dinner at the once-trendy-but-now-mostly-touristy Meatpacking District joint known as the Spotted Pig. (Oh, you West Coasters.)

One of the most interesting conversationalists of the night was undoubtedly ASmallWorld founder Joe Robinson, whose elite, invite-only social networking site has stood in stark contrast to the uber-open nature of many of the sector's leaders--and generated plenty of controversy along the way. Despite its rich-and-famous reputation, Robinson explained, ASmallWorld is really just meant to replicate real-world relationships in an online setting. He said that people ought to think of an invite-only but nevertheless diverse event like the Founders Club as analogous to his company.

"You're probably only one degree of separation away from anyone in this room," he told me.

Afterwards, the word going around the SNL studios was that the legendary Rockefeller Center bar known as the Rainbow Room was open for business, and that we ought to shift our attention there. Unfortunately, the posse of Founders Clubbers that I'd latched onto didn't quite make it over, since two members of our ranks were wearing sneakers--something that the Rainbow Room doesn't permit.

So we slunk somewhat sheepishly out the door, plagued by an awkward reminder that even though New York's technology scene might be thriving, things are still a little more formal around here than they are in the Valley.

See Also


Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

Microsoft moving closer to Centro

Microsoft moving closer to Centro

The product is still months away, but Microsoft is sharing a few more details on its forthcoming custom software package for midsize business servers.

Microsoft first announced its plans for Centro back in September 2005, saying at the time it would be based on the Longhorn version of Windows Server as well as the latest version of Exchange, then known by its Exchange 12 code name. The product will also contain additional security and management tools, Microsoft said this week, and will be aimed specifically at businesses with between 50 and 250 PCs.

As is often the case, it is dropping its memorable code-name for a larger mouthful. In this case "Centro" is becoming Windows Essential Business Server.


"That really fits with what we are trying to do with Centro," said Russ Madlener, director of product planning in the server and tools unit. Madlener said the server software is "essential" for allowing IT administrators to do more strategic work, rather than "putting out fires" and handling management tasks.

The company said it will come in two flavors, a standard and a premium version.

The standard server package, which actually runs on three physical servers, consists of Windows Server 2008, Exchange Server 2007, Forefront Security for Exchange, System Center Essentials, and the next version of ISA Server. The premium version also includes SQL Server 2008, which can run on a fourth server.


Microsoft didn't offer pricing details for the product, but said the server software will sell for a single price, as will the client access license required for each PC that connects to the server.


Private beta testing for Centro began last December. The company hopes to release a Beta 2 version in the next 30 to 60 days. Microsoft also said it has entered private beta testing for the next version of its small business server, code-named Cougar.


In May 2006, Chairman Bill Gates noted that Centro would be among a wave of new server products that ship only in 64-bit versions.


On the hardware side, Hewlett-Packard and IBM plan to ship servers that support the software, with software makers Citrix, CA, Symantec and FullArmor planning to integrate with Centro's management console.


The current plan is to ship the product in the second half of next year, ideally closer to the middle of the year, but Madlener acknowledged that some of that is out of his team's control.


"We're dependent on Windows Server 2008," he said. "We're dependent on SQL Server 2008...Until the other products ship, our hands are somewhat tied."


See Also


Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

Web triggers Wall Street retreat in music sector


Wall Street is taking record labels to task for lackluster Web sales, spiraling CD revenue and the defections of marquee acts, such as Madonna and Radiohead.



Nine Inch Nails' Trent Reznor


(Credit: Rob Sheridan)



Two analysts downgraded Warner Music Group last week, leading to a sharp drop in the company's stock price. One of the analysts, Richard Greenfield of Pali Research penned a gloomy report about why he thinks the sector is headed for even greater losses.

Greenfield wrote: "No matter how many people the RIAA sues, no matter how many times music executives point to the growth of digital music, we believe an increasing majority of worldwide consumers simply view recorded music as free."


Proof of this was provided last month by Radiohead fans. The British super group offered the digital version of In Rainbows, the band's latest album, for whatever fans wanted to pay. According to research firm, comScore, which conducted a study of the ground-breaking promotion, 62 percent of those that downloaded paid nothing.

To Greenfield, what's more disturbing is that Radiohead and a growing number of top acts perceive the Internet as an attractive alternative to record labels. Nine Inch Nails' front man Trent Reznor has indicated he plans to distribute his music online. Madonna announced last month she was leaving Warner Music for Live Nation, a music-promotion company.


"The paradigm in the music business has shifted," Madonna said in a statement announcing the switch. "For the first time in my career, the way that my music can reach my fans is unlimited."


Like Greenfield, Merrill Lynch analyst Jessica Cohen, downgraded Warner Music's stock from "neutral" to "sell." Both also lowered next year's earnings estimates for the company. Following the reports, Warner Music's stock hit a 52-week low ($8.78) on Friday. The company's shares, which were trading above $27 a year ago, closed Tuesday at $9.50.


What could be unsettling to those in the music business is that Warner Music was supposed to be faring better than the other three majors; Universal Music Group, Sony BMG and EMI, according to Greenfield. Earlier in the year, his view on the stock was slightly rosier.


"Over the past couple of years," Greenfield wrote in his report. "(Warner Music) has done an impressive job outperforming the industry weakness."


The main cause for concern continues to be spiraling CD sales. Download revenues are growing but not fast enough to ease the pain. Greenfield expects CD revenue to drop 22-percent in the 4th quarter of 2007. He said retailers, such as Wal-Mart, Target, and Best Buy are rapidly dedicating less floor space to the discs.


How bad off is the music industry?

Consider that the sector generated revenues of $14.3 billion in 2000, according to the Recording Industry Assoc. of America (RIAA). This year, it's expected to report revenue of $10.3 billion. Had sales growth only kept pace with the U.S. economy, it now would be worth $17 billion, Greenfield wrote.


This illustrates "how dramatically the music industry is continuing to under perform," Greenfield said in the report.

Greenfield urges music executives to embrace a new ad-supported business model, one that dramatically scales back the size of record companies and doesn't saddle songs with Digital Rights Management. He doubts this will happen anytime soon.

The industry is "not ready to endorse such a move at this point" Greenfield wrote. "Even if it was, the ...transition will be incredibly painful."


See Also



Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

Intel going mobile with Android?

Phone makers aren't the only ones interested in Google's Android software.

Of the 34 companies that agreed to join Google's Open Handset Alliance, Intel's decision to participate is yet another sign that the chipmaker is looking for alternative software to run on its Mobile Internet Device (MID) project. Most of the attention around Android focused on the mobile-phone market, and with good reason, as that area will be the first to get a sense of whether Google and its partners can actually make headway in this area.

But the world's largest chipmaker would still like to be the world's largest chipmaker in 5 or 10 years, when the personal-computing market might look very different. Intel has scrapped its own plans to enter the smartphone market, and so it's approaching the future of mobile computing from the other side, trying to shrink PC technology into compelling devices.

To date, this hasn't really worked. Smartphone sales are growing every day, while the Origami/Ultra Mobile PC initiative hasn't caught on at all, and Intel's now reorganizing its mobile plans around the MID with plans to ship Linux-based devices alongside Windows ones. But hardware-wise, the Menlow generation of MIDs looks very similar to the older UMPCs, and I wouldn't expect the 2008 MIDs to sell dramatically better than the ones currently on the market.



Intel might be interested in Google's Android software for MIDs, like this concept device shown at September's IDF.


(Credit: Tom Krazit/CNET News.com)


But in a few years, this project might turn into something more interesting, perhaps around the time Intel releases a chip called Moorestown by 2010. The company has said very little about Moorestown, but CEO Paul Otellini has set audacious power-consumption goals for the project and the company has worked up a few concept models that look more like smartphones than mobile minitablets.

"End users desire the ability to take the full Internet with them, the experience they have on their PC, in a nomadic or mobile fashion," said Gary Willihnganz, director of marketing in Intel's mobile group. That's language straight from the playbooks of Apple's Steve Jobs and Google's Eric Schmidt, both of whom this year have emphasized their commitment to delivering a PC-like Internet experience on a handheld device.


Android comes into play here because Intel and its hardware partners will need software to run the Moorestown-class devices. At the Intel Developer Forum in September, company executives spent a fair amount of time emphasizing non-Microsoft software as part of the MID project. To be fair, they did include the obligatory PowerPoint slide with the usual language about how Microsoft is a very important partner for Intel. Very, very important.

But ladies and gentlemen, now joining us onstage in a special appearance, the developer of Ubuntu Linux, Canonical CEO Mark Shuttleworth! Ubuntu received several minutes of valuable airtime during Intel mobile chief Anand Chandrasekher's keynote speech, while Microsoft, the biggest software company in the world and Intel's closest partner for decades, was reduced to a single slide.


After it was apparent that the Windows XP-class UMPCs weren't going to succeed, and after Windows Vista appeared to actually take a step back in terms of power consumption, Intel started moving away from its longtime partner. In Beijing in April, Chandrasekher admitted that Intel has been urging Microsoft to develop a more power-friendly version of Windows.


Vista was designed for PCs. It requires relatively powerful processors and significant amounts of memory, and those requirements don't make it easy to develop a small, sleek, handheld battery-powered device that needs to last all day and cost less than $500.

Linux, however, is more modular than some of the other options out there. You don't need to support 20 years worth of legacy code when assembling a Linux mobile phone, or make hard choices about what to exclude from a computer operating system, like Apple did with OS X on the iPhone. You just pick and choose components from various open-source projects to put together everything you need to run a phone, or maybe a minitablet computer.


Sounds easy, but the promise of mobile Linux has gone exactly nowhere over the past few years: "It's still in science-fair project mode," says my colleague Stephen Shankland. Collectively, Linux is the second most widely used smartphone operating system, behind Symbian and ahead of Microsoft's Windows Mobile. But dozens of companies combine to produce that market share, and there's no guarantee that an application written for one flavor of Linux will run on a different implementation.


It would be very hard for a company like Intel to place a bet on any one particular distribution. The company is clearly hoping that Google unifies the Linux market to give Intel a safer option for MIDs.

Of course, it's far from certain what might eventually evolve out of the 34 companies in the Open Handset Alliance by next year. Intel isn't quite sure itself. "We don't have a good feel for what it's all about, or what its capabilities are, much less any idea of how consumers are going to be able to value (Android software)," Willihnganz said. And Microsoft appears to have gotten the message, with a project under way to develop a stripped down Windows kernel.


It's hard to know exactly what to think of Android right now, since we have no idea what it looks like. But don't think of Android as just software for smartphones; if Google pulls this off, it could have much broader implications for other parts of the tech industry.

See Also


Source: CNET News.com - Business Tech

Vista conflicts = security wars

John_thompson John Thompson, Symantec’s chief executive, still seems sore with Microsoft about its move onto his anti-virus turf.

Symantec and McAfee, two of the leading companies in the field, complained about the new Vista operating system before its launch. Its improved PatchGuard security was inhibiting their access to the 64-bit version of the operating system’s kernel so that they too could prevent hacker attacks.

That spat has been resolved but Microsoft is still taking on Symantec and McAfee with products such as OneCare and Windows Defender protecting its operating system.

At the RSA security conference in San Francisco today, Mr Thompson followed a keynote by Bill Gates with his own speech, including remarks about Microsoft’s place in the security ecosystem.

“You wouldn’t want the company that created your company’s operating platform to be the one that is securing it from a wide range of risks, it’s a huge conflict of interest,” he said, to loud applause from delegates.

He said he refused to plug Symantec’s own products in his speech, but jokingly referred to Norton Internet Security 2007 on numerous occasions.

Microsoft looks forward on security

Mundie_1 Two aspects of the "new" Microsoft were on display in San Francisco on Tuesday at the computer security industry's biggest annual gathering, the RSA conference.

One came in the person of Craig Mundie, chief research and strategy officer. A 15-year Microsoft veteran with a background in supercomputing, Mundie's has long had an influential voice in Microsoft core strategic thinking. In the past, though, he has stayed pretty much in the background. At RSA, there he was sitting alongside Bill Gates, chatting broadly about the company's longer-range vision for security. Tellingly, he talked about how he and Gates had between them come up with the five-year-old "Trustworthy Computing" initiative, which marked a watershed in the company's thinking. As Microsoft prepares for Life after Gates, the history books are being rewritten to shift attention to a broader group of executives.


The other aspect was the drum-beat insistence on interoperability that creeps into just about every major presentation by a Microsoft executive these days. Gently, Mundie owned up to Microsoft's fallibility in this department. "We didn't do well in the past," he said, since for system-wide issues like security, effective interoperability is vital.


In future, according to Mundie, Microsoft will model its approach to interoperability on the chip industry. Chips are tightly integrated pieces of technology that have clear interfaces that other companies can "plug" their own technology into. So it will be with software: Microsoft is getting "more hardcore" about tight integration between the proprietary elements in its software, Mundie said. But it will also provide clear interfaces that other security companies can link to. As the company moves beyond its narrow vision of a world where all software is Microsoft, it is as clear a statement of intent as we've yet heard.

Office 2007 standards push on hold for now


Winning recognition for the "Open XML" formats in the new Office 2007 as international standards is a vital step for Microsoft. Without it, governments around the world will be less likely to adopt the new formats (and the Microsoft software in which they are embedded.)

So it is at the least inconvenient for Redmond, and potentially more worrying, that the International Standards Organisation has just added another three months to its review of the matter, following representations from the UK (and possibly other countries.) The ISO already recognises the rival Open Document Format, which has been gaining ground, so matching that is a must for Microsoft. How damaging could this be? Impossible to tell until more details of potential objections become clear, but being forced to return to the drawing board at this stage could cause Microsoft real problems.


Meanwhile, Texas has become the latest US state to join the rush to "open" document formats.

Lighting the way for European search


The latest quest to create a European search engine rival to Google got underway this week as 13 European companies and research institutes met in Rome to kick off the Pharos project. Among them were names like France Telecom, Circom, the body representing more than 300 of Europe's regional broadcasters and Fast, the Norwegian search software company, as well as Germany's Fraunhofer Institute. The meeting comes only weeks after Europe's previous attempt at search came apart at the seams. The "Quaero" project was launched last year by the French and German governments explicitly to create a challenger to Google, but just before Christmas the Germans pulled out because of disagreements over the scope of the project. The Germans, who wanted to focus on text-based search, are now pursuing their own "Theseus" project while the French continue with picture-based Quaero. Into this mix wades Pharos, armed with another classical name and €8.5m in funding from the European Commission.


This time there is less hubris. The project partners are very nervous of saying that they are looking for a "Eurogoogle".


They are at pains to point out that the area of audiovisual search is still wide open for research work. Google's keyword-based algorithms don't work particularly well here and Circom at least has a very genuine interest in finding some technology to help it catalogue its vast libraries of TV footage, without millions of man-hours spent manually tagging films.


But there is also some quiet defiance.

Lycos targets European internet hit


Lycos Europe, the German-based internet company, is starting another push to put European internet development back on the map.


Christoph Mohn, chief executive, said the company is to begin rolling out a pipeline of websites and services, among which he hopes will be a challenger to the dominant US companies like Yahoo, Google, MySpace and Facebook.


Mr Mohn has gathered together what may be Europe's largest internet developer team, some 400 engineers in Germany and Armenia. They have been working for the last 6 years to develop new, innovative internet products that Mr Mohn hopes will help restore Lycos Europe if not to its former glory, than at least to operating profit.


Lycos Europe is certainly in need of a boost. The company has internet service businesses and online dating services which generate revenues, but it has struggled to climb out of the red. Full year figures on Tuesday revealed a €1.7m profit for 2006, compared with a €20.2m loss in 2005, but this was chiefly due to gains from the sale of its Swedish internet access business for €19m.


The first product, Lycos iQ, emerged from the pipeline around a year ago. This is a local search service, much like Yahoo Answers, which allows people to post questions which are answered by real people knowledgeable on a subject. People ask about finding a good dentist in west London or a kindergarten in Munich.


Mr Mohn believes that with products like these Lycos can hold its own against Google.


"Our concept is not to develop a product that is better than Google at the core search product but to develop a search that is different. Around 30 per cent of searches are regional and these searches we can answer very well," Mr Mohn said.


Lycos iQ is the first of many products to be launched. Next week the company is bringing out Jubii.com, a messaging, photo sharing and internet calling site, in the US, right in the internet heartland. Mr Mohn says no one has yet combined these elements in the way he plans to do.


In total Mr Mohn is planning to launch five to 10 internet products each year. The formula is simple and opportunistic: act like a venture capital company backing dozens of different start-ups, and one of them is bound to be a hit.


"If you look at venture-backed start-ups, around 1 in 10 is a hit product, some do ok and you have a handful of flops. If we bring out a range of new products every year, every second year we should have a larger product on the market," he says.


The company will invest around €5m to €10m each year in building its pipeline. The pay-back is expected to start around two years from now, although it could be sooner if one of Mr Mohn's hoped-for hits arrives before then.



Toplist